<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It didn&#8217;t take long&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/</link>
	<description>Life Beyond The River</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:33:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rolo</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22347</link>
		<dc:creator>rolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22347</guid>
		<description>esto esta mejor que una novela!!! =)
thank god for laeastside</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>esto esta mejor que una novela!!! =)<br />
thank god for laeastside</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuy90023</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22328</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuy90023</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22328</guid>
		<description>Sorry to change focus here, but did anybody note that there was exactly ONE PASSENGER on the train when the accident happened at 8:20pm Thursday night? 

I realize it was a holiday, but it still seems to illustrate the ludicrousness of the splurge---all while north-south transit options on the Eastside continue to be nearly nonexistent and while riders on all bus routes at all times continue to wait inordinate amounts of time to get to their destinations because buses don&#039;t have their own lanes.

Anyway, just sayin&#039; (again).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to change focus here, but did anybody note that there was exactly ONE PASSENGER on the train when the accident happened at 8:20pm Thursday night? </p>
<p>I realize it was a holiday, but it still seems to illustrate the ludicrousness of the splurge&#8212;all while north-south transit options on the Eastside continue to be nearly nonexistent and while riders on all bus routes at all times continue to wait inordinate amounts of time to get to their destinations because buses don&#8217;t have their own lanes.</p>
<p>Anyway, just sayin&#8217; (again).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WALT!</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22318</link>
		<dc:creator>WALT!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22318</guid>
		<description>It took 8 weeks of trains doing test runs at full schedule before this happened. That&#039;s roughly 240 trains a day, or 1 crash per 13,440 train trips. 

There is definitely a learning curve. Living in Highland Park along the crossing-guard-free section, I am surprised and glad to say there hasn&#039;t been an accident all year. In the first years there were many, but drivers, people, chickens and dogs have seem to come to reckon with the train. 

That being said, there is no way in Hell the conditions Metro has in Highland Park would have been acceptable in Southpas. The Marmion Way section would have been tunneled for sure.

OK, I&#039;ve said too much. I just wanted to be the 63rd commenter and say THANKS for keeping this blog ad-free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took 8 weeks of trains doing test runs at full schedule before this happened. That&#8217;s roughly 240 trains a day, or 1 crash per 13,440 train trips. </p>
<p>There is definitely a learning curve. Living in Highland Park along the crossing-guard-free section, I am surprised and glad to say there hasn&#8217;t been an accident all year. In the first years there were many, but drivers, people, chickens and dogs have seem to come to reckon with the train. </p>
<p>That being said, there is no way in Hell the conditions Metro has in Highland Park would have been acceptable in Southpas. The Marmion Way section would have been tunneled for sure.</p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ve said too much. I just wanted to be the 63rd commenter and say THANKS for keeping this blog ad-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Hero</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22317</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22317</guid>
		<description>Choo, choo :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choo, choo <img src='http://laeastside.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobThomas</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22316</link>
		<dc:creator>RobThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22316</guid>
		<description>Gustavo
November 29th, 2009 &#124; 5:38 am

The above comment is a classic case of “the pot calling the kettle black”. A rudimentary observation of the commenter’s prior posts will reveal he uses similar tactics with similar results.

...............

For example?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gustavo<br />
November 29th, 2009 | 5:38 am</p>
<p>The above comment is a classic case of “the pot calling the kettle black”. A rudimentary observation of the commenter’s prior posts will reveal he uses similar tactics with similar results.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>For example?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobThomas</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22315</link>
		<dc:creator>RobThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22315</guid>
		<description>Francisco, you whined about people wanting safety barriers on light rail routes, and tied the concept in with big government in general, yet for some reason in all of your criticism of big government you left out the expansions of government related to the war and prison industries.  I had to haggle with you to get you to criticize those expansions of government.  No haggling necessary for you to criticize guard rails and warnings on toaster ovens, though.  

As far as Afghanistan goes, do you not believe we should be there?   Should that war be ended, outright, in your view?  Regarding the prison industry, do you believe non violent drug offenders should do prison time?  Do you believe marijuana should be legalized for all adults?   I&#039;m asking you these questions because they all tie in to big government, government spending, etc.  It all costs money. 

Regarding road paving, I&#039;m not sure how much money the private contractors get, the cost of asphalt, paint, etc. has to be in the millions.  The labor is cheap, that&#039;s obvious.  You made your point about state workers and their wages.  But big government expansion doesn&#039;t stop there.  Do we really need to pave roads right now that aren&#039;t severely damaged?  Don&#039;t you find it funny that with the fiscal trouble the state is in, they have money to do these unnecessary repairs?   Heard you loud and clear on state workers and the cost of their payroll.  But you didn&#039;t really answer the question on private contracts to unnecessary construction/repair projects.  Come on, Mr. Small Guv.  Let&#039;s hear where you stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francisco, you whined about people wanting safety barriers on light rail routes, and tied the concept in with big government in general, yet for some reason in all of your criticism of big government you left out the expansions of government related to the war and prison industries.  I had to haggle with you to get you to criticize those expansions of government.  No haggling necessary for you to criticize guard rails and warnings on toaster ovens, though.  </p>
<p>As far as Afghanistan goes, do you not believe we should be there?   Should that war be ended, outright, in your view?  Regarding the prison industry, do you believe non violent drug offenders should do prison time?  Do you believe marijuana should be legalized for all adults?   I&#8217;m asking you these questions because they all tie in to big government, government spending, etc.  It all costs money. </p>
<p>Regarding road paving, I&#8217;m not sure how much money the private contractors get, the cost of asphalt, paint, etc. has to be in the millions.  The labor is cheap, that&#8217;s obvious.  You made your point about state workers and their wages.  But big government expansion doesn&#8217;t stop there.  Do we really need to pave roads right now that aren&#8217;t severely damaged?  Don&#8217;t you find it funny that with the fiscal trouble the state is in, they have money to do these unnecessary repairs?   Heard you loud and clear on state workers and the cost of their payroll.  But you didn&#8217;t really answer the question on private contracts to unnecessary construction/repair projects.  Come on, Mr. Small Guv.  Let&#8217;s hear where you stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22313</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22313</guid>
		<description>Rob,

I don&#039;t like big government wasting money on a fruitless drug war. Yes we wasted billons in Iraq, and now we are wasting billons in Afghanistan.

I&#039;m pretty sure the private contractor fixing our roads is still less cost than a state payed employee. A private contractor won&#039;t keep a lousy employee around like our state government, the state employeee unions see to that.

Try barking at another tree, Mr. Thomas, and I agree with the comment above. I have read your comments before, and Rob Thomas seems to be pretty bitter about something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like big government wasting money on a fruitless drug war. Yes we wasted billons in Iraq, and now we are wasting billons in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the private contractor fixing our roads is still less cost than a state payed employee. A private contractor won&#8217;t keep a lousy employee around like our state government, the state employeee unions see to that.</p>
<p>Try barking at another tree, Mr. Thomas, and I agree with the comment above. I have read your comments before, and Rob Thomas seems to be pretty bitter about something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22312</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22312</guid>
		<description>The above comment is a classic case of &quot;the pot calling the kettle black&quot;. A rudimentary observation of the commenter&#039;s prior posts will reveal he uses similar tactics with similar results. Focused comments are the reason for these threads, to build on the topic and reach some common ground. Unfortunately some individuals see it as a place to exercise their bulbous egos, and the bulk of the readership suffers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above comment is a classic case of &#8220;the pot calling the kettle black&#8221;. A rudimentary observation of the commenter&#8217;s prior posts will reveal he uses similar tactics with similar results. Focused comments are the reason for these threads, to build on the topic and reach some common ground. Unfortunately some individuals see it as a place to exercise their bulbous egos, and the bulk of the readership suffers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobThomas</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22311</link>
		<dc:creator>RobThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22311</guid>
		<description>Spokker, I&#039;m glad Art has the patience for born liars like you, but I don&#039;t.  We didn&#039;t fight or argue.  You put words into my mouth.  You brought race into this discussion before anyone else (something anyone can see by reviewing the entire blog entry and comments), yet accused others here of being race mongers.  You&#039;re a troll, an instigator, and most of all a drama queen.  You&#039;re not looking to make life better for any residents of Los Angeles.  You just have a lot of time on your hands and money to spare, and you get your rocks off antagonizing those less fortunate than you who seek to change their conditions through public protest.  You use ideology and a disagreement with their means as a front to get into the discussion.  Once you&#039;re in, your singular goal is to say things that you know will offend people.  Condescending lectures about people learning to read crosswalk signs, knowing that&#039;s beside the point.  But you have no intention of addressing the point.  Your mission is to see how many people will object to your snide.  From there, you just keep punching away.  Now that you know what makes them mad, you hit their soft spot repeatedly until they either bail out on the discussion, or they decide to be the adult in the conversation, as Art did, and give you the benefit of the doubt, which is the last thing you deserve.  Once that happens, you then coil back into your innocent, concerned citizen shell, and confide in that person with a &quot;whoa is me&quot; complaint about all of the people starting shit with YOU.  And, to emphasize how far above the fray you are, why not call out your manufactured bullies by name for an added touch?  Just like Republicans who get caught in sex scandals, people like you wind up getting flattened by light rail trains moving at speeds of 3 mph while you&#039;re changing the battery in your camera, because the train operator assumed people in Santa Monica were too smart to walk in the train&#039;s path and decided to check his text messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spokker, I&#8217;m glad Art has the patience for born liars like you, but I don&#8217;t.  We didn&#8217;t fight or argue.  You put words into my mouth.  You brought race into this discussion before anyone else (something anyone can see by reviewing the entire blog entry and comments), yet accused others here of being race mongers.  You&#8217;re a troll, an instigator, and most of all a drama queen.  You&#8217;re not looking to make life better for any residents of Los Angeles.  You just have a lot of time on your hands and money to spare, and you get your rocks off antagonizing those less fortunate than you who seek to change their conditions through public protest.  You use ideology and a disagreement with their means as a front to get into the discussion.  Once you&#8217;re in, your singular goal is to say things that you know will offend people.  Condescending lectures about people learning to read crosswalk signs, knowing that&#8217;s beside the point.  But you have no intention of addressing the point.  Your mission is to see how many people will object to your snide.  From there, you just keep punching away.  Now that you know what makes them mad, you hit their soft spot repeatedly until they either bail out on the discussion, or they decide to be the adult in the conversation, as Art did, and give you the benefit of the doubt, which is the last thing you deserve.  Once that happens, you then coil back into your innocent, concerned citizen shell, and confide in that person with a &#8220;whoa is me&#8221; complaint about all of the people starting shit with YOU.  And, to emphasize how far above the fray you are, why not call out your manufactured bullies by name for an added touch?  Just like Republicans who get caught in sex scandals, people like you wind up getting flattened by light rail trains moving at speeds of 3 mph while you&#8217;re changing the battery in your camera, because the train operator assumed people in Santa Monica were too smart to walk in the train&#8217;s path and decided to check his text messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spokker</title>
		<link>http://laeastside.com/2009/11/it-didnt-take-long/comment-page-2/#comment-22310</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeastside.com/?p=10030#comment-22310</guid>
		<description>&quot;Im glad we can have some civil discourse, spokker:)
And I agree that this issue is not cut and dry, but the finite amount of space to write things and the fact that my wife doesnt like me spending hours on teh computer make me ration my comments.&quot;

You make very good points and you are also changing my mind on some things. Keep in mind that I don&#039;t think I was fighting with you, just browne and RobThomas :)

As far as inequality goes, I think the highway system has more to do with it than transit. I actually wrote a term paper on how the highway system created an unequal transportation network, and mentioned the Eastside as an example of an area that got shortchanged. 

&quot;The original goldline was going to have 2 stops in la city limits, and a dozen in pasa and southpas.&quot;

Which two stops would those have been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Im glad we can have some civil discourse, spokker:)<br />
And I agree that this issue is not cut and dry, but the finite amount of space to write things and the fact that my wife doesnt like me spending hours on teh computer make me ration my comments.&#8221;</p>
<p>You make very good points and you are also changing my mind on some things. Keep in mind that I don&#8217;t think I was fighting with you, just browne and RobThomas <img src='http://laeastside.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As far as inequality goes, I think the highway system has more to do with it than transit. I actually wrote a term paper on how the highway system created an unequal transportation network, and mentioned the Eastside as an example of an area that got shortchanged. </p>
<p>&#8220;The original goldline was going to have 2 stops in la city limits, and a dozen in pasa and southpas.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which two stops would those have been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.398 seconds -->
